Debate 1: The Perfect Man For The Job
Updated: Nov 10, 2019
November 8, 2019
It's off to a great start for the #1 candidate in period 5A of AP Gov! Samuel exemplified all of the qualities that got him nominated in the first place: humility, transparency, relatability, and strength. Unlike all of the other drafted, scripted, and dry speeches composed by the other candidates, Samuel chose a short, straight-to-the-point introduction for his campaign accompanied by a 5-star smile and two thumbs-up. While his opponents either yelled at the audience or read frequently from their 15-page paper, Samuel stayed composed, maintained eye-contact with the public, and emphasized his ardent feelings towards policies on climate change, (#LessCO2LessToLose), education(#ReduceCollegeDebtYouBet), immigration, and gun reform. Sam stated simply and powerfully his desire for a mandatory gun registry while Cecilia Weaver of the Search Party remained quiet and Matthew Tsai stated that there should be a voluntary registry, even though he mentioned later that "registries don't solve anything." To reinforce his strong relationship with the people, Samuel believes that women should get the same wages as men, like a "Target match-your-price-tool", a very common part of the American culture. In conclusion, Matthew Tsai is more suited to be a yelling-Dictator than the leader of a constitutional federal republic. Cecilia Weaver has some promising qualities, but lacks the public connection, engaging attitude, and perspective Samuel exhibits. Stay tuned for the next debate where Sam will continue to show strength, dedication, and heart towards his campaign for President.
Comments